A new data investigation argues that The New York Times sharply changed the way it covers transgender people beginning in 2022, moving from rights-based framing toward more skeptical, conflict-driven coverage that elevated opponents of transgender rights and gave less prominence to transgender people themselves.Related: A mom asked the NYT publisher about harm from trans coverage. He defended the process insteadA shift in the paper of recordThe analysis, published Friday by civil rights attorney Alejandra Caraballo in The Dissident, reviewed 3,242 Times articles published between 2014 and early 2026. Caraballo also published an accompanying data site, where readers can review the findings and methodology.“This isn’t about any individual story,” Caraballo told The Advocate in an interview Monday. “This is about the whole corpus of how they’ve covered trans issues over time.”The New York Times did not respond to The Advocate’s request for comment for this story.Caraballo, a clinical instructor at Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic, said she undertook the project because years of criticism from transgender writers, journalists, and advocacy groups had often been met by the Times with defenses of individual stories. The problem, she said, was not always factual error, but the cumulative effect of framing, story selection, and prominence.“It is harder on the individual level because there isn’t anything usually factually wrong with their stories,” Caraballo said. “But part of the problem is the framing, what they choose to highlight, and how much priority they give certain stories.”Caraballo said she used The New York Times’ own public databases to identify stories about transgender issues, including articles the paper had tagged under transgender-related subjects. She then retrieved the text of most of those stories from archived web pages and analyzed them using the same set of questions for each article. Three different AI models reviewed