Crisis Support
Trevor Project: 1-866-488-7386
Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860
Crisis Text Line: Text START to 678-678
Culture The Advocate

Federal judge declines to block DOJ efforts nationwide to obtain trans youth medical records

Maryland U.S. District Judge Julie Rubin, a Biden-era appointee, rejected a first-of-its-kind bid from transgender advocates that would establish a national order preventing Trump’s Justice Department from strong-arming hospital systems and service providers into giving away sensitive patient information about trans minors who receive gender-affirming care, per Reuters. Rubin heard arguments Tuesday from families of transgender children and LGBTQ+ legal advocates seeking certification of a class action lawsuit against the DOJ that would have blocked the department from pressuring hospitals to share private medical records.Related: Federal judge blocks FTC probes into trans medicine groups, citing ‘extensive evidence of animus’ Although she previously struck down the DOJ’s effort to obtain the records of trans minors from Washington, D.C.’s Children’s National Hospital in January 2026, according to GLAD Law, finding that the “subpoena lacks a legitimate purpose,” the judge denied certification of the novel class action lawsuit that would prevent similar efforts by the DOJ nationally. She did not issue an order from the bench but later made her final decision on the matter, Baltimore's NBC affiliate, WBAL, reported. According to Reuters, she was unable to make the “unprecedented” decision to certify the national lawsuit on Wednesday.She did reaffirm her previous decision to quash the DOJ’s subpoena seeking the names of transgender patients from Children’s National Hospital and said the plaintiffs’ “arguments are well-taken,” Reuters reported. Rubin is among several judges who have blocked Trump’s DOJ from obtaining records related to transgender youth through subpoenas, including U.S. District Judge P. Casey PittsP. Casey Pitts in California and U.S. District Judge Mary McElroyMary McElroy in Rhode Island.“Movants' request for class treatment is simply an ill fit for the matter before the court and the relief they seek,” Rubin wrote

This is a summary from The Advocate. Read the complete article on their website.

Read Full Article on The Advocate
Opens in a new tab. QueerLine is not responsible for third-party content.

The Advocate

This article was automatically aggregated from The Advocate, a trusted LGBTQ+ news outlet. QueerLine curates headlines from verified sources to keep the community informed.

Back to News Full Article
Stay Connected

Community news, new resources, and LGBTQ+ updates. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.