Crisis Support
Trevor Project: 1-866-488-7386
Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860
Crisis Text Line: Text START to 678-678
Culture The Advocate

Trans teen at center of Supreme Court sports case wins West Virginia state title

On a spring weekend in West Virginia, as classmates and families gathered for the state track and field championships, Becky Pepper-Jackson stepped into the throwing circle carrying a burden far larger than a shot put.The Bridgeport High School sophomore is not only a state champion. She is also the transgender teenager at the center of one of the most consequential LGBTQ+ rights cases now before the U.S. Supreme Court.Pepper-Jackson, 15, won the West Virginia Class AAA girls shot put championship Friday with a personal best throw of 38 feet, 11.75 inches, according to results reported by the West Virginia Gazette-Mail. The victory came roughly four months after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in her challenge to West Virginia’s transgender athlete ban and just weeks before the justices are expected to issue their opinion.A ruling is expected in the coming days.Related: 7 takeaways from Supreme Court arguments about bans on trans women and girls in sportsThe case, argued before the justices in January alongside a challenge to Idaho’s similar law, could determine whether states may categorically exclude transgender girls from girls' athletics under Title IX and the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. The outcome is expected to shape school sports policies nationwide.West Virginia enacted its “Save Women’s Sports Act” in 2021, barring transgender girls and women from competing on female sports teams in public schools and colleges. Pepper-Jackson sued the state with support from the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal after she was blocked from participating in her school’s cross-country and track teams.According to court filings previously reviewed by The Advocate, Pepper-Jackson began receiving puberty blockers and hormone therapy before experiencing testosterone-driven puberty. Her attorneys have argued that the state’s assertions about inherent competitive advantage do not reflect her circumstances and that the law unlawfully

This is a summary from The Advocate. Read the complete article on their website.

Read Full Article on The Advocate
Opens in a new tab. QueerLine is not responsible for third-party content.

The Advocate

This article was automatically aggregated from The Advocate, a trusted LGBTQ+ news outlet. QueerLine curates headlines from verified sources to keep the community informed.

Back to News Full Article
Stay Connected

Community news, new resources, and LGBTQ+ updates. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.